"124" wrote in
message
ups.com
Arny Krueger wrote:

"124" wrote in
message
oups.com
[George M. Middius's abusive post deleted.]
George should have left this forum years
ago. Almost all of his posts here are abusive.

Dealing out abuse seems to be George's whole reason for
existing. He almost never posts on-topic. He might have
made 5 on-topic posts in the past 5 years.

First and foremost George wants to have people agree
with him. Had RAO been overwhelmingly objectivist when
he first started posting here, he'd probably be
vigorously attacking subjectivists to this day.

If I was a subjectivist, I would be deeply ashamed to
have someone like George on my side.

Some people seem to be "getting" that.

George, perhaps
more than any other person on
this forum, discredits the subjectivists.

I think that Art Sackman ("Clyde Slick" this week) comes close.

If one cannot
supply any evidence to support one's position, one must
resort to insults or abusive posts.

If you read carefully, George is against stuff like hard evidence.

Of course, not all
subjectivists resort to insults or abusive posts--e.g.,
Jenn. If only all subjectivists were like Jenn, then
this forum could be a place for civilized debate.

Jeen plays here own sick little game of pretentious superiority based on a
deep dark secret that she can talk about but can't reveal. She's obviously a
sockpuppet, but whose?