"Arny Krueger" wrote:

Jute, you mark information with your personal copyright about as
indiscriminately as a dog marks trees. The level of significance is about
the same. You seem to be grossly ignorant that almost everything that you
mark with a copyright is at best a derivative work for which you should be
giving credit to the original author. By refusing to give proper credit to
the original author, you are doing more than a little thieving of your own.

The use of "copyright" symbols is rampant, and it means little in terms of
protection. I have seen nothing by Mr. Jute that a court would support as
copyright-able.