"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

"Pooh Bear" wrote in message
...


Iain Churches wrote:

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...


Actually, of course, KISASS is extremely simple - that being the whole
point of the exercise. It also works better than your pathetic - and
never built - piece of DHT trash.

Just a moment Mr.P, just a moment. You yourself admitted that you
had not bothered to build your design, and neither has anyone else on
this group. So whence your assertion that it "works better?"

I was interested to build your amplifier, and showed your
schematic to the head of technical service at Swedish TV.
He studied it carefully, for thirty seconds, screwed the paper
into a ball, tossed it into the waste bin.

Is that supposed to be a measure of design skill ?

If anyone showed me a schematic of an SET withut context, I'd likely
respond
the same. What's the point in recreating tired lousy old designs ??

Agreed. If someone seriously showed me a diagram of any electronic system
that was locked into ca. 1920's technology, and it wasn't for a museum
display, it would be hard to take it very seriously. There was a
tremendous lot of technological advance between the 1910-1920s and the
1940-1950s. Push-pull and inverse feedback come to mind...

Once again, Arny, "fennelly enough", you totally miss the point:-)
The design to which I refer was supposed to be Stewart's SS equivalent
of Andre's KISS amp.

Iain