Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:24:50 +0200, Forwarder wrote:
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:42:08 +0200, Forwarder wrote:
Don Pearce wrote:
OK, I've had a bit of a think - and I've written a protocol, which I
believe would be a basis of fair testing of audio components to
resolve such issues as cable sound etc.
I invite all here to read what I suggest, and let me know if I have
either missed something, or am being unfair on one direction or
another.
http://www.donepearce.plus.com/odds/dbt/
I think this could be a way of defusing the vituperation that
currently surrounds the subject.
So what do you think?
Hello Mr Pearce,
What you suggest seems reasonable. We have done a very similar test with
great success (for speaker cables).
Yeah, riiiiggght. That's what Zipser claimed - *before* the 'Sunshine
Trials' proved him wrong.
So there was nothing wrong with the "sunshine trials" then? The
"sunshine trials" are RPOVEN to be %100 applicable to this conundrum
then? Nothing at all imanginable? Never ever concievable that there
might have been something WRONG! with the "sunshine trials" ?
Zipser himself accepted the result in the week following the trials -
Ok, so now *that's* science! The sciecnencienceecee kind of science.
it was only later, perhaps when amplifier sales began to drop off,
that the excuses started...................
Yeah right, I'm gonna take your word for it you retarted prick.
Lying prick yourself - I said I'd done it many times and that there
were no audible differences,
Then you would have never become a "tweeko". You stated on many
occasions, so did krueger as a mattar of fact, that you guys used to
hear differences but that they were not reliable observations. Now that
you are old enough that if a donkey ****s you in the ear you still
wouldn't hear
it................................................ .................................................. ................
which is absolutely true. That doesn't
prevent one from having *been* a 'tweak', and then discovering by
experiment what a load of ******** it all is.
You OWN A KRELL for chrissakes! Nuff said.
No, you dumb prick, the Krell is there because I have insensitive 3
ohm speakers.
That's not the point you pathetic borg of a retard. Take a 200 dollar
receiver to a lab, put it behind an ABX box, take your krell put it on
the other end, level match, play, A, B, then X WHAM! no difference!
*THAT'S* the point.
The Audiolab sounds identical,
And so would a yamaha receiver off the shelf of some woolworths. So why
own audiophoolery exotic amps like krell and "audiolab" produced by conmen?
but gets very hot if I'm
playing rock music.
That's not the point you pathetic asshole of a retard. Take a 200 dollar
receiver to a lab, put it behind an ABX box, take your krell put it on
the other end, level match, play, A, B, then X WHAM! no difference!
*THAT'S* the point!
It's also there so that clowns like you can't
claim that i've never heard a decent system.
You don't own a decent self, you don't own decent ears, you don't own
*any* form of decency you prick, what the **** does your exotic
audiophoolery amps have to do with anything?!?!?!
and
.................................................. .................................................. ...................
Now go spit in the mirror.
Anyone as such a detestable, disgusting blowhard freak like you, should
spend at least 15 minutes each day making disgusting faces and spitting
in the mirror! It would give you some perspective, you prock, as what
you subkect people to with your disgusting existence.
That's a fine example of projection.
Yeah the mirror'll be projecting you.