wrote in message
ink.net...

"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:53:42 +0000, Pooh Bear
wrote:


124 wrote:

If an audiophile spends more than $200 000 US
for a power amplifier and is presented with evidence that it sounds
identical to a $200 receiver, to accept the evidence would mean a
devastating blow to that audiophile's ego . If I spent that kind of
money on a power amplifier and was presented with the evidence,
there is a very good chance that I would never accept the evidence.

The correct term is audiophool. ;-)

Graham

So, the person who owns a Rolex is a phool as well?

If he thinks it's going to tell time better than a Timex.


It has a better sounding alarm.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access