What have you ever done for audio, Arny?
"Bret Ludwig" wrote in message
oups.com...
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Andre Jute" wrote in message
oups.com
What have you ever done for audio, Arny?
Globally? ABX.
ABX is a nonsolution to a nonproblem of noninterest to anyone. Why
don't you build a tube amp and have some fun?
Because they don't reproduce recordings accurately. They are inefficient,
distorted, unrelaible and inferior.
You will never convince
anyone they don't sound better, any more than you will convince the
Pope the Immaculate Conception is not in the Bible and that Mary was
not beamed up to the celestial starship. Or Margaret that she has a
fishy issue to deal with.
Better is a subjective term, accurate is not. If you find that you prefer
the sound of tubes, then go for it. I and others prefer to hear what teh
recording actually is supposed to sound like.
Why don't you build something useful like a car that doesn't rust or a
homebuilt airplane that doesn't take a piece of **** Lycoming engine?
If audio is a solved problem, listen to your QSC amps and do something
different.
What did you compare the QSC amp you spoke of with?
Or were you just talking out your ass as usual?
|