Pooh Bear wrote:
Robert Morein wrote:

"Pooh Bear" wrote in message
...


Robert Morein wrote:

Andre, with all due respect, your post is loaded with religious faith,
which
does not coexist well, or interact well, with scientific thought.

Same goes for his faith based love for the SET. ;-)

Graham

I'm not a SET fan, but I'm skipping that. It's very popular to bash people
on account of their personal taste. It's cheap, predictable, and boring.

The point actually was that - despite their clear limitations ( recently
discussd in depth )

I must have missed that. All I saw from you, Poopie, was personal
abuse. When you were invited to make a specific technical contribution,
you ran away.

that Joot prefers an SET over an amplifer that can be
demonstrably shown to be vastly more accurate.

You don't listen. It is widely know that I prefer the sound of PP
trioded EL34 over SET; it is widely known that I am an admirer of the
pure pleasing livability of Quad transistor amplifiers. My point is
that SET has right to exist, and a right to please those who prefer it,
despite the jeers and sneers of people with a vested interest in a
discredited paradigm who offer nothing better.

That's an example of 'faith' winning over science. Like the God squad.

Have it your own way. You're the only one who thinks your opinion
matters. You might observe that when I hear the same opinion from
someone I respect, I treat it with respect and discuss it with respect.
Your mind is too rigid to be worth the effort.

It might be less hurtful for you to stay out threads beyond your mental
capabilities, Poopie. We promise to take as read your constant spite
towards better men, evidenced by your constant nasty invasions of
threads where you have no business.

Graham

Unsigned out of contempt