"Trevor Wilson" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"Schizoid Man" wrote in message


I cannot believe the audacity of Judge Johns. Not only is
he legislating from the bench, he is also not qualified
to dismiss the scientific theory of intelligent design as
'thinly-veiled creationism'.

I don't know why Christians feel the need for their own unsupportable
theory of creation just like the one that the secularizers have
(evolution).

**The problem with that is that Evolution is a fact. It is observable and
undeniable. What is not completely understood, are ALL of the factors
which contribute to evolution. Darwin, in his seminal work, attempted to
explain a good deal of the fact of evolution, by the term: 'Natural
Selection'.

Correct. It is "Natural Selection" that is unproven, not "Evolution."
Conceivably, the selection process could be the result of "Intelligent
Design."