PART TWO "SET dogma maximizes distortion" -- Arnie Krueger Lie No 51291
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Andre Jute" wrote in message
oups.com
Arny Krueger wrote:
ÿ the usual SET dogma of maximizing distortion.
Let's see what the words mean before we make the same
sort of
foolish, zero-science, zero-brains, bottom of the
food-tree mistake Krueger made about the musicians:
"usual" i.e. normal, customary or typical. Okay, that is
what we
do, we build...
"SET" i.e. single-ended triode amps.
"dogma" i.e. a set of beliefs that a religious, political,
philosophical or moral group holds to be true. Okay. We
are not a religious or a political group because we have
no articles of faith (we're ecumenical about silicon or
tubes as long as it is melted
sand) nor any desire to proselytize the unwashed. But RAT
is definitely a philosophical and moral group, as the
purpose of our hobby is high fidelity, an attachment to
truth in culture and life, which we usually interpret as
decently flat amps.
Flat response and SET amplifiers don't mix well if operation into normal
speaker loads is considered. SET amps tend to have far higher output
impedances than good SS amps and this means that their response is highly
depdenent on speaker impedance curves.
"maximizing" i.e. to make something as large as possible.
Whether
we want that depends on what is to be made larger. Most
of us don't, for instance, need penis enlargement; those
who do, like the thief Bret Ludwig, is anyway a
treacherous little slimeball Krueger can take away to RAO
with him free of charge.
Note that this response has no useful responsive content once the gratuitous
personal attack is removed.
"distortion" i.e. altering a signal so that it becomes
unclear or unrecognizable. No, that's very definitely not
us.
Wrong. Distortion is altering or size of a signal. Since SET amps have
relatively large amounts of nonlinear distortion, they alter the shape of
signals they amplify. Since SET amps tend to have very nonflat frequency
response with loudspeaker loads, they alter the size of the signal from
frequency to frequency.
So, you claim, Krueger, that it is our usual practice,
supported by our moral philosophy, to make the distortion
in our SET amplifiers as large as possible?
So it seems.
Is this patent absurdity a troll, Krueger. or do you
really believe your own dumb ****? If so, prove that we
design our SET amplifiers to "maximize distortion".
See above individual responses to your comments, Jute.
|