On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 09:17:52 -0500, George M. Middius cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote:



paul packer said:

Robert, if you don't mind me saying so I think you demean yourself
trying to justify yourself to people who use your history as a weapon.
Personally I find the tactic beneath contempt, partly because no one
who wasn't there can really know anything about it, whatever they
pretend, and partly because attacks should be based on posts and not
personal history that's no one else's business.

One can safely assume that even you look favorably on throwing the
Krooborg's phoney christianity in his face.

It depends on the nature of his "Christianity". If avowed Christians
occasionally slip, I don't believe in bludgeoning them with their
faith. However if they persistently adopt a holier-than-thou stance
and then slip, well, anything goes.

Phil Allison on
aus.hi-fi has perfected this art of using snippets of past history as
a bludgeoning club; that alone should tell you why it's too
contemptible to be worth a reply.

We on RAO have almost no direct experience with that individual. If you want
to educate us, you should crosspost some examples of his objectionable
posts.

I see you've now been initiated. Thanks, Phil, for saving me the
trouble.