View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Robert Morein
 
Posts: n/a
Default sorting out Andre Jute


"Lionel" wrote in message
...
Robert Morein a écrit :

1. Is "Andre Jute" the poster's actual name, or is it a sockpuppet?


Bad question Bob.

Dédé is a crybaby desperately looking for acknowledgment.

Nothing else than the question that usually normals people keep for their
own private meditation :
"What did I do of my life ?"

Now if you have a charitable and patient soul you can try to give him a
little help. ;-)

Lionel,
There is one thing which is quite striking. "Jute" is an exceptional
writer. I take pride in the quality of my usenet writing, but Jute's efforts
dwarf mine. Please take my word that whoever this guy is, and regardless of
his ethics, etc., this is a person who is accustomed to churning out
proposals, articles, etc., at high speed. The fact that he has the mental
energy to write stuff like this for pure amusement is quite telling. Such
abilities do not arise without practice. It indicates that in "real life",
"Jute" is an extremely active writer, probably for publication, proposals,
or both.

Now mind, I'm not saying he is a good person. I don't pay much attention
to the argument, but I am interested in the personality. It adds to my
curiosity. Whatever Jute does in the "real world" -- and it might have
nothing to do with audio -- the quality of his writing, and organizational
skills, suggest that his level of achievement may rise above the trivial.

With most of the other people around here, and I mean native English
speakers, not adventurers from another tongue like yourself, the level of
writing either indicates casual effort, or certain intellectual limitations.
Most of the guys write like typical engineers, which is to say, not very
well. Others write casually, mere jots for amusement. Some have the ability
to write formally if pushed to the wall, but with painful slowness. And then
we have a guy like "Jute", who churns this out for fun.

If "Jute" is a bad guy, it indicates that any level of ability can be
used for amoral or immoral purposes.