"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...


Does anybody know if there's a general term for the specific condition of
being unable to see yourself as others see you?

Being human. Most people don't see themselves the way others do. Take you
for instance.
You are obviously a vile, disgusting excuse for a human being, yet you think
you are humorous.

I know a lot of broad syndromes encompass an alienation from reality in
general, including paranoia, schizophrenia, and schizoid-type disorders.
My
question isn't focused on the Krooborg, for a change, but on duh-Mikey.
The
poor thing keeps prattling about "facts" and "science" and "reality", but
if
there's an RAO regular who is more estranged from those concepts, please
tell me who it is.

OSAF

Mickey has repeatedly claimed that Arnii Krooger does not
initiate hostilities.

Which thread did he start with the intention of attack someone the way you
are doing here?

What can one say to such an assertion?

You could offer some sort of proof.

He's also
claimed that "most electronics sound the same" and that aBxism is a valid
and useful method of comparing audio gear, but he has zero experience with
aBxism rituals or, in fact, DBTs of any sort.

And that is disproven by what data?

He also claims that despite
knowing about the sameness of most electronics, he was a successful
salesdroid in a retail store.

Not a claim, a fact.

One can only guess which store, but it's a
little hard to accept that Mickey could ever have sold a high-end system
to
anybody.


Yet it happened, proving that you are not quite as good at evaluating people
as you might think.

Throughout all these travails, duh-Mikey continues to insist he's right
about everything he says.

There being no facts offered to prove otherwise, yes. I have on occaison
been shown to be in error and have said so.

His argumentativeness, though not atypical among
Usenet addicts, is especially obnoxious because he never hears
counter-arguments and never changes his opinion, no matter how much
evidence
is presented to dissuade him.


Since there hasn't been much to show otherwise, yes.

Yes, I call Mikey the Bug Eater, but that's not the kind of term I'm
looking
for. G

You call everybody you disagree with some sort of name, especially if they
are correct.