"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ink.net...

"Ruud Broens" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ink.net...
:
: "Clyde Slick" wrote in message
: ...
: It most certainly is an assumption.
: I heard differences you are neither able to hear nor to measure.
: Buy a hearing aid, or come up with some better ways to measure.
:
: If they can't be measured they can't be heard either.
:
:
Maybe so.

Until someone identifies some new thing there is nothing known that
people can hear that can't be measured. Things that can't be heard but
are present in an audio signal can also be measured. The measuring
equipment is far more sensitive than the ear.


But there are not measures for all of the parameters, such as imaging
information in the signal.

Imaging comes from the recording and is reproduced by the speakers.
Unless you have a reaaly ****ty amp then it has nothing to do with imaging
or the quality or qauntity of it.