"Lionel" wrote in message
...
: In , Ruud Broens wrote :
: : How to know it ? This braggart mainly spent his RAO time in discussions
: : about pedophilia. :-(
: : Note that considering the level of his last intervention it's perhaps
: : better for him. :-)
: :
: : --
: : "Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote.
: : But what's new around here?"
: :
: : Dave Weil, Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15
:
:
: ...................................
: He Lionel,
:
: your like/dislike balance is all in one position,
: your dishes no longer spicey
: but
: sour 'nd bitter
:
: what's cooking ?
:
: Rudy
:
: Good evening Rudy,
:
: Since I'm sure that you are an intelligent and attentive reader I'm
: convinced that you have noted that I wasn't speaking about
: "like/dislike balance" but just about some abrupt and peremptory judgments
: about people's tastes.
: Considering that my own tastes are in constant change (evolution ?) I do my
: best to stay as far as possible from the "that's all crap".
:
: ...But my soup is still correctly salt, at least to my taste. ;-)
: What else ?
:
I assume you've gathered it was a comment on 'le ton' in many
of your recent postings on RAO ;-)

so, how about some audio content, sir ?
(think Wargames : "A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.
How about a nice game of chess?")

the question i recently put to Arny, how would you go about
comparing different drivers for some loudspeaker design
(assuming a multi-driver setup) ? say, a tweeter:
you'll have different frequency range, different frequency response,
different sensitivity , different dispersion, different power handling
capacity, different impedance, etc., etc.
now, say you'd have a perfect 10 Hz - 6 kHz 'lower part' of the design
ready, how to compare these different tweeters ?

for starters, you'll need different xo's for the drivers
so you're not _really_ comparing apples with apples
as some tweeters will 'use' more of the range produced
by the lower part
than others :-)

any practical ideas ?
cheers,
Rudy