Robert Morein wrote:

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Robert Morein wrote:


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


Robert Morein wrote:

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Like you Morein, AFAIK Richman has offered no evidence on RAO
that suggests knowledge of the difference between an ohm and a
volt.

Which is,l of course, irrelevant re. knowledge or lack of knowledge
about various audio phenomena.

Between the grotesque typos and the abject ignorance, this has to be
one
of
the funniest posts I've ever seen on RAO. It is also a tacit admission
that
I'm right - neither Richman nor Morein know the difference between
an ohm and a volt.

Definition of "tacit":

Definition: [adj] indicated by necessary connotation
though not expressed directly; "gave silent consent"; "a tacit
agreement"; "the understood provisos of a custody agreement"

It is clear that neither Dr. Richman nor I have given out consent, as
required by the above definition.

The definition above does not absolutely require explicit consent on your
parts. Indeed, the use of the word by me indicates that no verbal consent
has been given, nor is one expected.

Of course not. In your warped, twisted version of reality, you exact
"admissions" from people without their agreement, understanding, or consent.
You can and do say that I "admitted" that white is black, according to this
preposterous, deceptive, lying, scandalous abuse of the English language.


Agreed. This type of extremely transparent lying, in which Krueger tries to
invent what people have actually said (as opposed to what really happened) is
one of may reasons that he has been repeatedly identified as RAO's most widely
despised and hated posters of all time. His anti-subjective-opinion views have
nothing to do with it. His basic dishonesty, which is quite pervasive, is the
main reason that practically nobody has any respect for him on RAO.


But the whole point is to neutralize you, just as I did with McCarty. Today
he is a laughingstock. We'll just keep at it until you are equivalently
marginalized.





I'd say about 99% of RAO already has seen through his years of lying, charades,
slanderous attackis on many individual posters, and self-serving paranoid
propaganda. And for the one person who blindly parrots and defends his every
utterance, who cares?




Bruce J. Richman