dave weil a écrit :
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:41:01 +0100, Lionel
wrote:
dave "deaf" weil a écrit :
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 22:11:55 +0100, Lionel
wrote:
when you first read my truncated review
Your review was a total fiasco
Not what you said at the time...
No at this time I said :
About Dave's BULL**** speaker review.
http://tinyurl.com/8u5fb
You unshamed liar... ;-)
"Dave, I'm not making any insulting accusations that appear
elsewhere in
this thread.
Do you plan to release to the group a summary of your observations?
No I don't. Sorry.
I'm agree with you Dave you haven't to do that.
But you don't need either to be sorry.
Why to be sorry"?
And, of course you wrote that it wouldn't have mattered WHAT I wrote
anyway:
"Yes I like to make nasty jokes about Trotsky and his speakers can you
understand that ? I despise Trotsky, he is an idiot, a cruel idiot.
Every critics you would have been able to write about his speakers
would have been munition for my sarcasms".
Actually, as it turns out, you are FAR more cruel than Trotsky could
ever wish to be. Funny how things turn out...
And of course, "Ok dave it sounds like a good serious job".
Or: " Dave, I guess that you have been brutally honest or perhaps
honestly brutal ? 
)"
Or: "Don't be sorry, Dave, I imagine that this test has been an
interesting and fun experience. I don't want to mark down your
pleasure but I haven't any chip on my
shoulder".
The last statement of yours marks YOU as a liar. You have one of the
biggest chips around here. Note the change of tone from what *I* quote
and the way you treat me now.
I already told you that Dave.
You was swimming in ridicule at this moment. IMHO, even if predictable,
you wasn't deserving such ingratitude from Trotsky. In fact I was
feeling a lot of pity and compassion for you... this explains my above
comments.
BTW at this time I didn't know that you only were an unshamed braggar.
and I have been the *only* one to read it.
Actually I know of someone else who read it.
That's right, yes Trotsky... :-D
Oh, that's two.
LOL ! I seriously thought that you would have the wit and decency to
omit Trotsky of your group of *readers*.
of a certain speaker.
Of a bull**** speaker...
Funny how you pay so much attention to its components. You spend lots
of time trying them out and testing them and reading about them.
Yes that's right. A lot of DIYers have done the same thing and arrived
to the same conclusion : the component are correct for the price but the
speakers combinating W20RC38 and YAG-20 are bull**** due to the hole
frequency between 1 and 3 khz.
Since I have read what you wrote about them I conclude that you have
serious hearing problem in this frequency range.
You still haven't enumerated your complaint. You've got to show some
correlation.
Already done...
Not my fault if you are afraid to comment the material I brought. :-)
Unfortunatly you cannot know that so you are
excused. ;-)
I already discussed some of the shortcomings of the speaker.
LOL, you was just writing : "bloom in the midrange"
You are a liar but it's not new... :-)
Oh, is THAT what you're hanging this on?
I think THIS is the phrase that you were looking for":
"The upper bass/lower midrange gets blunted or a bit
"congested" somehow".
Unfortunatly for you I don't comment on the bass/lower midrange which
are according the connoisseurs the strong point of the SF W20RC38.
Or the fact that I talk about how "lean" the speaker is throughout
most of the review. I went back and looked for the phrase "bloom in
the midrange" and didn't see it. Perhaps you could provide the quote
in context. I searched for it and the only example of that phrase was
someone telling me that they didn't expect me to write a phrase like
that. Perhaps your memory is faulty.
In fact, when attempting to explain to Paul Dormer what I meant by
lean (hey, there's a third!) I said "When the sound is lean (jangly
top end and punchy low end)...". Note the FR emphasis points. Sounds
to me that I intuitively recognized this hole (surely you don't claim
that there is NO midrange possible with this configuration) that
you're discussing. But perhaps you could show this damming phrase that
you quote in context.
LOL, there's a hole of 2 khz Dave in one of frequency range where the
music have most of information.
Your review is like your general RAO writings blur, hollow and undefine
full of way to escape in case of attack.
A serious audio lover and good audio reviewer would have written first
"this speakers have a redhibitory hole in the high-midrange..."
My conclusion is that you have hearing problem. Your audio comments on
RAO have zero value.
You are deaf Dave, deal with it.
Looks like I've got you all wound up again, and I didn't have to do
anything...
It was just an advice from me Dave. Even if you go to consult your ENT
you will not be obliged to inform us.
BTW since you are a skillfull liar I am sure that you will be able to
continue to write tons about audio even if you miss 75% of the musical
message... You see, once again, I blindly trust you. ;-)