"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...


Sillybot preaches to a congregation consisting of himself. And duh-Mikey,
one supposes.

We've heard 'explanations' from ABXism believers till the cows come
home. What is required is +ve results/validaton of ABX with music and
components under sensible conditions. Just something that shows it
works, that's all.

The definition of 'works', among audiophiles such as yourself , seems
to be, 'validates what I believe to be true based on sighted
listening'.

Still waiting for a cogent explanation of what "science" has to do with
choosing recreational toys.

Any day now. Or any year.....

It has to do with what people claim to hear as different from components
that don't have any differences in sound quality. Science has provided a
way to determine if those differences actually exist, For those who want to
use it, it's there and it's useful.

For those who already understand how things are supposed to work, it's
probably not used much.

For those who don't care, they'll probably never use it.

I assume you would be in that last group. If so, you needn't let everybody
know every five minutes, we got it.

If you think you'll stop people from talking about it, you are deluded,
since at any given moment there are who knows how many people who are here
for the pupose of learning.

They have a right to know about how they can make better buying decisons if
they so desire. They like you can choose not to read it.