wrote in message
ups.com...
wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
wrote:
Try looking for BBC engineering monograph no. 52
I have better things to do with my time than following your delusions
once again just to hear another one of"Oops".
You found something - quote it here.
Ludovic Mirabel
Right whatever you do don't look at any evidence, especially ones that
might
give positive results from an ABX comparison.
It won't kill you to just plug it into you search engine.
I promised myself to ignore your postings because there's neither
pleasure nor profit to be found there. But the flesh is weak..
I'll make you a deal: You write to S. Olive and apologise for sending
him a forged document and I'll read and comment on your site..
Ludovic Mirabel
You want me to lie?
I forged nothing. I used a direct quote of one of your idiotic ramblings,
which Olive said was not true, in no uncertain terms. I also paraphrsed
something you have been saying, and I do not believe that I misrepresented
that in any way.
You keep claiming you want evidence about ABX. You claim it is no good for
audio comparisons.
Is there any evidence other than anecdote that confirms sighted listening is
reliable or even worthwhile for detecting subtle differences?
Of course the answer in no, otherwise somebody would have produced it by
now.
Ludovic, you can believe whatever you want, and obviously do, in spite of
the fact that ABX and ABC/HR are used routinely is audio testing, and plays
an important role in product development in more than one company and by
many different kinds of audio research.
wrote in message
oups.com...
Robert Morein wrote:
I suggest you contact Mikey privately.
None of us have to know it.
It is important for Mikey to receive some guidance from someone he
looks
up
to.
Arny, you are Mikey's father figure. Live up to that expectation.
I suggest that NYOB's postings suggest that not only he lost touch
with ordinary human decency but that he lost touch with reality-
whichever came first.
Examples: In Oct. he said that he had shown that BBC.used ABX. I
said
that he never did, that he could not because no such evidence exists
and challenged him to repost his reference. No answer.
He repeated this two days ago. Again when challenged :
BBC, B&O and Harman DID NOT USE ABX
DID NOT USE ABX
DID NOT USE ABX
Disagree? Quote one excerpt from each to show that they did.
He answered:
"Already did that with the BBC you idiot."
Of course he did not because BBC never had used it
Example 2 He said that it was he not Sean Olive who sent me a
collection of Olive's papers. He never asked for my address, and I
never gave it to him. But I got a big envelope with a friendly note
from S. Olive in California about one month ago.
Example 3
He fabricated some moronic note from a "preson" mailed it to S.
Olive
for his criticism and then attached my name to it.
These fabrications are too clumsy for simple malice and dishonesty.
They are delusional.
Systematised paranoiacs can function fairly well in daily life but
hang
on to their delusional hang-ups about a particular situation or
person.
If you think it is creepy you're right.
Ludovic Mirabel.