"Signal" wrote in message
news
" emitted :

Right whatever you do don't look at any evidence, especially ones that
might
give positive results from an ABX comparison.

Following your own advice I see, what with eyes dangling limply on
thine cheeks, tendrils flexing from thee sockets.

Why are you so reluctant to proffer the overwhelming "evidence"?

Reluctant????????????????
All you have to do is put ABX into your search engine and you'll come up
with hundred if not housands of articles explaining why DBT is better than
sighted listening.

Could
it be that your argument is weaker than a **** bucket full of holes?

I'm not the one trying to refute that ABX is not a good way to test for
subtle differences.
I'm not the one who beleives that an ABX box masks differences.
I'm not the one who has no evidence whatsoever to prove that sighted
listening for subtle differences is as good or better than DBTs.