On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:50:16 -0400, "Robert Morein"
wrote:


Never? Perhaps, if someone is interested, and throws enough money at it, ABX
will come to the point where it has an edge over whatever it is an
accomplished ear does to test a component. I give it that possibility. That
doesn't mean it has to be used. There will still be people with the ability
and desire to do it their own way. And when they speak here about what they
like, and what they don't like, we should listen with respectful interest,
even if we disagree with their conclusions.

I think what bothers me about any form of A/B testing is that certain
aspects of audio evaluation are so subtle (yet real in the sense of
providing long term satisfaction) that they only become apparent after
weeks or even months; there's almost an element of osmosis at work.
I've had my current amp for months yet only now feel I'm getting a
handle on its sound---and yes, it does have a sound. Those who truly
listen to their equipment will know what I mean; the rest will
continue to be happy with their JVC integrated--and I don't mean that
sarcastically since a JVC integrated is all most people need and
anything more would be a waste of money. But those who truly listen
know the subtleties of sound, the particular sheen certain amps give
brass, accurately or not; the rosin on the bow example that you
yourself cited; the depth and air only the best equipment can recreate
but which is imperative to any kind letting go and sinking into the
music. As I say, Arny's invention is admirable and useful in many
circumstances, but not for the dedicated audiophile contemplating an
important purchase.