"Robert Morein" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Robert Morein" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"paul packer" wrote in message


[snip]
More arrogant twaddle from someone who apparently has
highly limited reading and thinking skills. I'm
thinking Paul that maybe you have an IQ in the 110-120
range? IQ is not a really good indicator, but your
inability to see the more obvious subtlties of the
situation point in that direction.


I'm flattered that you copied my "so-and-so is a
stupid person" gambit, but Paul is not the guy to do it
to. Unlike you, me, or practically anybody else on
r.a.o., Paul has never stooped to a low blow.

Here's a concept for you Robert - a spade is a spade.

He has been a model of cordiality.

Other than his implicit insults to people's intelligence.

Please clarify, Arny. Did you challenge Paul's
intelligence

a. because you feel he has challenged yours?
b. because you genuinely suspect Paul has low
intelligence?

c. none of the above.

Except in very rare
circumstances, it is impossible to tell very much about
a person's native intelligence, and certainly not from
someone's attitudes. In David Halberstam's book, "The
Best and the Brightest", he chronicles how some of the
most talented and brilliant member of this country's
elite made the tragic mistake called Vietnam. The
correlation between "book intelligence" and common sense
is not as strong as it should be.

I said what I said, Robert and I'm sticking to it.
But for what purpose?

Please see "a spade is a spade".

Is your purpose
a. Verbal aggression, which you justifiy because you feel
you have been victim of same?
b. "Outing" what you honestly feel is Paul's low IQ ?

c. none of the above

By his own admission, Paul is not pointed toward hard
science, but he may have sensibilities and abilities of
an artistic, verbal, and proportional nature of which
you are unaware. Paradoxically, the music we listen to
and care so much about is mostly composed by non
scientists, created by people who mostly don't care
about our argument at all.

That would make them a lot like me, because I don't care
a lot about the argument at hand, either.

Then why do you respond so violently to challenges to
your practice of ABX?

Your reply to Paul is a stark illustration of your
antisocial tendencies.

Yeah, like I'm such an antisoical dude, Robert. I'm an
officer in all of the social organizations that I'm a
member of because I'm so antisocial.

Arny, I can't comment on what I don't see. If the rest of
your life is more balanced than what you exhibit here,
that's a good thing. I can see where organizations would
give you a job, because they need workers, while
retaining doubts about you on a social level. Perhaps you
think they like you.

While such a post might be excused
in the context of the gamesmanship that goes on with
other players here, it will not be understood in terms
of Paul's gentle challenge to you.

See "implicit insults to people's intelligence".

I'll await further explication by you.

enjoy!

Note to Middius: Arny's post is unequivocal evidence of
your thesis that he's nuts. While whether he's insane is
up in the air, Arny has strong antisocial tendencies. He
doesn't play well with his friends. I suggest retaining
Arny's reply for periodic FAQ posts.

Just goes to show that Morein can't distinguish between
sanity and boredom with his endless know-nothing
posturing.

Obligatory arnyisms:
Thanks for admitting you're a nasty person.

No, just bored with dumbness.

Just goes to show Arny can't tell the difference between
nasty and nice.

If you want nice Robert, be nice - for more than 10 seconds.

Arny, you need to buy a clue about cordiality.

I do cordiality well, even with people who are total
@$$holes. But enough is enough. Spades are still spades.