Michael McKelvy wrote:


Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Arny Krueger wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:


"JBorg" wrote in message
om
Arny Krueger wrote:


My claim is that I


Shut the **** up.
Is there a problem here, you retarded simpleton?
My claim is that Susan Kroobitch is not takin in enough
dough from her nightly rounds in the back alleys there
in Detroit. What a stupid ****. Therefore here's a thing
to do: Have a gynecologist and proctologist detach, retouch
and reattach her vagina away from her asshole and stitch
them both back to their normal, original position. That
might do the trick. Then have the pastor from your local
church give that wrinkled gaping vagina his blessing by
asking her next Sunday to come forward during the mass
and order her to spread her pussy apart in front of the
congregation for everyones full view. If the pastor's cock
rise immediately after pulling his own pants down while
standing next to her, that means she has his blessing.
She is good to go, you incoherent, staggering cumstain.
That's the advice for Arnii Kroo**** the embittered
pederast.

Notice that Bruce Richman, by his silence wants you to believe that
this is perfectly normal and commendable behavior.

Unprovoked personal attack duly noted.

Richman, how is a personal attack since I present it without any
judgment, and you claim that it is indeed perfectly normal and
commendable behavior?


That is a lie. Show where I have claimed it is normal and commendable
behavior.

Richman you've set yourself up as our resident mental health expert.
Interestingly enough, you seem to only be able to comment on the mental
health of people who disagree with you. In the process you let any amount
of
reprehensible behavior go scott free.


Actually, Krueger, your claim that I have set myself up as RAO's resident
mental health expert is just another lie and a figment of your
imagination.
Comments about the mental health of a few people on RAO in recent times
(you
and McKelvy) have absolutely nothing to do with agreement or disagreement
as
you incorrectly assert. If your claim were true, which it is not, I would
then
be making comments on the mental health of other people whose views on
individual prefernces, politics and a host of other topics talked about
here do
not correspond to mine. As others here have pointed out, the reason you
are
held in contempt my many has nothing to do with your anti-tube,
anti-vinyl,
anti-individual-prefernce bisases. Rather, it has come about because of
your
compulsive tendncy to engage in personal attacks against people who don't
agree
with your biases and endorse your agenda.



However, your mindfreading effort to infer what I am
thinking and criticize me (and by extension, all others) for not
criticizing JBorg's post is of course, ridiculous and assumes facts
not in evidence.

Richman, I notice that even when prompted, you still can't bring yourself
to
comment on JBorg's post. You dance around it, but you won't address it.


Krueger, you were not engaging in a prompt, you were engaging in making a
false
claim not borne out by any evidence.
And once again, here, you try and distract others from seeing that basic
reality. It would appear that the vast majority of RAO's readership has
failed
to comment on JBorg's post as well, yet you have failed to make the same
false
claim about them. Therefore, it would appear that you are not really
interested in condemnation, you are simply trying (and failing) to
rationalize
another one of your unprovoked personal attacks.




It is noteworthy that Krueger has neglected to mention that so far,
EVERYBODY POSTING OR LURKING ON RAO has also been silent about this
post. Therefore, it would appear that Krueger thinks that all on
RAO beiieve this is normal and commendable behavior.


lack of Krueger to dispute this valid observation is glaringly obvious
in his
failure to respond


We shall all eagerly await Krueger's advancing the theory that by
his silence, Michael McKelvy also thinks this is normal and
commendable behavior.

McKelvy commented on it, but you still haven't, Richman.


McKelvy also has claimed that I don't exist and has made numerous
reprehensible
false claims about me. Did y somehow miss your condemnation of those
posts?
It is also a fact that the majority of the RAO readership has also not
commented on Mr. Borg's recent post about you. Therefore, it is obvious
that
you are simply posturing and attempting to engage in another unprovoked
personal attack.



As do____________________ (fill in the blank of any RAO poster not
named either Krueger or McKelvy).

LOL!

It's easy to conclude that Richman feels he is perfectly justified
as long as there is one other person who acts as spinelessly as he
does, or if there are even many other people who act as spinelessly
as he does.

In other words, you cannot defense your ridiculous false and probably
delusional claim that all who have not commented on JBorg's post
approve of it.


I never said any such thing.


In other words, you approve of the fact that others have not commented on
Borg's post, but somehow have managed to single me out for a personal
attack
for the same behavior.



Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the
reprehensible JBorg post.


Note that Krueger continues to try and promote his latest self-serving
unprovoked personal attack in which he fails to mention the documented
fact
that almot nobody has commented on the Borg post.

Note further that Krueger has never raised one word of protest concerning
the
patently false personal attacks and libelous claims made in numerous
attack
threads perpetuated by McKelvy.





This would suggest to most people that Krueger's
claim that others condone this post - without any evidence of course
- is simply another example of his paranoid views of what happens on
RAO.

The fact that you've mentioned it so many times without actually
commenting
on it tells a lot of about your character Richman, or lack thereof.


Actually, Krueger, my mention has simply been in response to your false
claims
about my behavior. Your attempt to in personality evaluation based on
something I haven't done (comment on Borg's post) is as ridiculous as your
numerous attempts over the years to evaluate and smear the behaviors of
all
that disagree with you in any way.



It's thinking like this that has empowered any number of repressive
regimes throughout history. It's thinking like this that empowers
the KKK, Hamas, and any number of other terrorist groups worldwide.
Racists and anti-Semites of the world, do what you will knowing that
Richman is right there with you in spirit!

Paranoid ideation and conspiracy theories duly noted.

Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the
reprehensible JBorg post.


Note that the vast majority of RAO readers have not commented on Borg's
post.
Note that Krueger has failed to establish any causal connection between
failure
to comment on a post and approving that post. Note that he has simply
given
RAO additional evidence of what Bob Morein has referred to as "bad
science".



I'm sure that
all of the posters on RAO that have chosen not to comment on JBorg's
post about Krueger will be surprised to find out that we have all
been equated with "repressive regimes".

They don't hold themselves out as mental health professionals and
guardians
of the public good like you do, Richman.


Of courwe not, Krueger. Most of the people here have other occupations.
The
fact that I am a mental health professional has nothing to do with
repressive
regimes.
Your silly attempt to equate attempts at repression with that profession
simply
illustrate your woeful ignorance about what clinical psychologists
actually do.
Of course, you've also made false statements about the licensing
requirements
for psychologists so that is not surprising. And, of course, no attempts
have
been made by me or any other rational person here to talk about the public
good
- which you fail to define in any way. And as you are probably aware,
antiSemitism is unlikely to be a cause I would champion or support. So
your
pathological attempts to equate my behavior with that of a repressive
regime
are ludicrous. Further, as Bob Morein has recently documented, it appears
that
you have tried to restrict and repress the free flow of information on
another
audio NG so your comments about repressive regimes have been shown to be
hypocritical.



No doubt Krueger also thinks tha RAHE, from which he has been banned,
is also a repressive regime.

Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the
reprehensible JBorg post.


Note that, in an effort to avoid responding to salient observations made
by me,
Krueger engages in attempts to distract readers by his customary
cut-and-paste
dronig of irrelevant statements made earlier in the post.


Note that Richman is so excited that he can't even spell simple words
right.
Note Richman's attempt to distract the discussion from his inability to
comment on the contents of the morally reprehensible JBorg post, even
though
he's now mentioned its existence many times.


Note that Krueger's pathetic attempt to talk about typographical errors
conveniently ignores the fact that he has been freuently observed to
engage in
botched grammar, incoherent sentences, and of course, spelling errors.
Note also that mentions of Borg's post have only been made in response to
Krueger's paranoid accuasations about silence equaling commenation.
Note further that Krueger has failed repeatedly to establish a causal
connection between failure to condemn a post and approval of the same
post.
Note also that his attempt to make the ridiculous false claim that failure
to
codemn a post equals approval of that post is just another example of "Bad
Science".


And as Bob Morein has recently pointed
out, it appears that on rec.audio.tech, Krueger is attempting to
restrict free speech and start his *own* repressive regime.

No, my goal has been to provide a demonstration of how Bruce Richman is
highly selective in his public judgments, and won't say one critical word
about someone who viciously and gratuitously attacks the same people that
Bruce Richman likes to gratuitously attack.


The above satements are blatantly false, as any rational reader can easily
discern.
Krueger recently attempted to provide proof of gratuitous attacks that he
wrongfully imaged I have made. He and McKelvy have made this false claim
many
times over the years. And the first post he listed as evidence of an
unprovoked
attack contained a discussion of the music of Daniel Lanois between myself
and
another poster. It had nothign to do wit Krueger. LOL !! Theefore
Krueger's
false claims about my judgments and posts are serioulsy lacking in
credibility.



Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the
reprehensible JBorg post.




Note that as Krueger has done in he past in attempts to promote his
self-serving and quite paranoid propaganda, he has engaged in
cut-and-paste
repetition of the same claims ad nauseum.



Bruce J. Richman


Pretty much what you do. You keep repeating the same gibberish over and
over expecting that it will make a difference. Psychotic, blah, blah,
slander, blah, blah, blah, libel, blah, blah, liar, blah, blah. No wonder
you like vinyl, you;re a broken record.




Another delusional IKYABWAI from the delusional compulsive liar, McKelvy, who
is currently engaged in trying to perpetuate forever a smear campaign against
me on RAO. He's failed in that regard and he's also failed to convince
anybvody other than Krueger of any of his idootic claims.

Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist
Bruce J. Richman