"surf" wrote in message
. ..
" wrote ...

"Robert Morein" wrote...

The subject matter is your beliefs regarding ABX.
At least from your side, you just keep pretending it's invalid and that
it not one of the most widely used protcols for diference testing.


Have you ever done an ABX test Mike?
No, but how is that relevant? Do you need to stand on the sun to know it's
hot?

Since the wealth of evidence is on the sinde of ABX and other forms of DBT,
I see nothing form anywhere else to make me think that they are invalid.

See my post where I quote Sean Olive, who I guarantee is more knowledgeable
on the subject than Robert or myself. His views are part of the mainstream
regarding audio testing. People who deny this to be true are simply
ignoring reality because it doesn't match their perceptions.

How many times do I, or any of the other DBT advocates have to say that
nobody is obliged to do a DBT of any kind and they are free to use whatever
criteria they wish for their buying decisions? It is only when claims are
made about technical aspects that don't match what is known, that a DBT is
suggested.