"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
As far back (and probably before) as 2000, the compulsive libeler and
liar
McKelvy was engaged in unprovoked personal attacks against me. In a
thread
that eventually included more than 400 posts, including many from the
compulsive liar and libeler McKelvy, he used his *very first post* to
engage in
his usual form of libel. Note his use of the same libelous term he
continues
to use to this day. It should be pointed out since his post was one of
the
first in this thread, no mention of his name was made by me prior to
his
unprovoked personal attack. The post is reprinted below:
From: Mikeylikst )
Subject: Second Thoughts
View: Complete Thread (459 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
Date: 2000/01/22
From:
Calling Dr. Quackenbush!
Mix equal portions of hatred, bigotry and ignorance - and you often
end
up
with
The Resistance.
Mike McKelvy
"The aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and
hence
clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of
hobgoblins,all imagnary."
The above is a quote from H.L. Menken, you idiot.
You didn't read the post, scumbag and libeler.
Of course I did. You do se the " marksdon't you? The quote from Menken is
a well known one. I stand by my comments on the "Resistance." It's nomore
than a collection of idiots who have nothing better to do than slander and
libel others they don't like. The onlything they are resisting is decent
behavior, while criticising others behavior.
Or are you going to lie again,
and claim that Menken used the name, "
r. Quackenbush", you retarded
piece of
****?
Of course not, nobody would demean Menken by trying to claim he would bother
with you.
Your reading comprehension problems are once again exposed - as are your
lies.
http://members.aol.com/rlspeakers/TH...SOUNDPAGE.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-----------------------------------------
If one cares to check the Google record, one will also find a few other
interesting things about this post. I freely admit that on the post of
mine
which lead to McKelvy's unprovoked personal attack, I had made some
humorous
comments about a person who used to post here.
You mean you made a personal attack.
Wrong, liar. You deleted part of the post as part of your usual practice
of
forgery and deceptive post modification. You deleted a smiley emoticon
generally cocsiderd by most infelligent life forms on RAO (which
eliminates
you) to mean trhe comment preceding it was made in jest.
How about all the times you don't include an emoticon? You make plenty of
disgusting comments without using one. To most intelligent life forms, that
shows you are a disgusting pig.
Of course, you would never know
that from McKelvy's deliberately modified distortion of what I actually
wrote.
(1) As you can seen he deleted the end of one of my sentences.
Just like you're doing here and now.
A lie. Care to discuss your recent forgeries of posts I've made by
transparent
attempts to change pronouns and other silly and obvious deceptive editing
bull****?
Sure, I make
typographical errors and don't use a spell checker. But I don't
usually
leave
sentences that dangle like the one he screwed around with. (2) The
probable
reason he deliberately modified what I wrote was because at the end of
my
comments, I inserted an emoticon smiley - clearly indicating that my
comments
were meant to be humorous.
McKelvy's silence is deafening at this point. Apparently, he couldn't
"think"
of a decent bull**** defense or rationalization to counter this factual
claim)
Or else I thought you were doing a good job of making yourself look like an
idiot.
What does this all prove? The following points;
(1) McKelvy has been proven to have lied when he claims that he only
attacks
those who attack him first.
I never specified that it had to be ME who was attacked first. I don't
like
to see anybody attacked for no reason. Not even you.
Prove it. Attack those that attack me or others that you frequently
attack.
To the best of my knowledge, you've never done so.
One of the keys is it has to be an unprovoked attack. I've never seen
anyone attack you without provocation. Of course I don't read every post
and usually avoid yours.
If you think you have the
right to engage in unprovoked personal attacks against anybody on RAO who
attacks your friend, Krueger, than, of course, you are as guilty as he is
of
wanting a lifetime free pass to attack almost everybody on RAO.
And your right to attack people unprovoked comes from where exactly?
Sorry, scumbag
and libeler, but that type of self-serving rationalization for your
despicable
unprovoked personal attacks is duly noted.
As are yours.
You wanted some evidence of your unprovoked personal attacks and I
provided it.
No, you only provided your usual lies and half truths.
I'm sure I could have gone back much further on RAO and provided much
more,
but exposing you for the compulsive liar you are even in this small
example is
sufficient proof for all objective readers.
Objective readers? You and the guy in your pocket?
(2) McKelvy has been shown to have lied when he denies making
unprovoked
personal attacks against me in which his name was never mentioned.
See above.
(3) McKelvy has a lengthy history of making libelous comments about my
professional activities without any factual evidence to support them.
And you never do anything like that. Riiiigghhht.
For once in your miserable libelous "life", you are correct.
Failure to recognize sarcasm noted.
Of course, you
don't engage in any professional activities, have no credentials, and no
title
(other than resident compulsive liar and libeler) AFAIK. Unlike you, I
have
not claimed that the degrees, licenses, etc. of professionals posting on
RAO
don't exist or were made up.
So? What has that to with you being an asshole?
(4) As he has proven today in his deliberate attempt to forge a post
made
by me
by obviously transparent modifications of the text, he has a lengthy
history,
just like his role model, Krueger, of engaging in selective editing and
deletions of content from posts written by others.
Usually because they are long and boring.
A blatant lie. The sole purpose for your deliberate deletions is to hide
evidence of your compulsive lying, libel and ignorance.
How do you know what I find boring? If I'm a compulsive liar, it should be
easy enough for others to see. So far it's only you.
The sole purpose of this
fraudulent behavior is obviously to try and distort what others have
actually
said. Misquotes and lies are how he exists on RAO.
Prove it. If I alter something you wrote, the original is always available
for comparison.
I don't really need to distort what you say, you make an ass of yourself
with nearly every post.
A delusional, paranoid, psychotic poercerption you get to have. Most of
RAO
disagrees with you - not that there's anything wrong with that.
And it doesn't make them right either.
Are you denying that you have recently engaged in forgeries of posts that
I
have made? Feel free to lie again as is your custom.
No, I don't deny it, but I clearly indicated the whole thing was a satire.
Now, I have no doubt that compulsive liar and libeler McKelvy, will try
to
rationalilze his despicable unprovoked personal attacks upon by me by
some
old,
tired, irrational argument. He will also try and apply either evasive
comments, forgery, spindoctoring, and/or other transparent attempts to
deny his
obvious guilt. However, he can't change the Google record, which is
there
for
all to examine and draw their own conclusions.
Unlike you I prefer the truth.
ROFLMAO !!!! SCORE !!!!
This cretin has just uttered one of his biggest lies of all time.
Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist
P.S. Stay tuned for tales from McKelvy entitled "Google Lies to Me"
LOL !!!!
Bruce J. Richman
I'm sure everybody will be waiting for your next batch of lies. :-(