"Robert Morein" wrote in message
...

" wrote in message
link.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
news

" wrote in message
link.net...

"Robert Morein" wrote in message
news

No I don't. You advocate using a complicated machine to control the
flow
of
audio. It is your burden to prove it works properly.


That burden has been met, that's why ABX is widely used and accepted by
those in the field of audio research.


He is talking about a particular machine right now, not about
DBT methodology


He's BEEN talking about both.

He can prove nothing about either.

The ABX box doesn't color the sound or mask any differnces.

Yes it dies.
The protocol is widely used in everyday audio research precisely because
it
does reveal differences, WHEN THEY EXIST.

While ABX may be a useful tool for investigation of Hindi phonemes, it has
not become the primary tool for designers of high end equipment. Sighted
testing is commonly used.

Only by those that aren't doing anything original, and are relying on
previous work by other actual engineers.