"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
" wrote in message
link.net...
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
news
" wrote in message
link.net...
"Robert Morein" wrote in message
...
"ScottW" wrote in message
news:7eh2f.3085$jw6.1293@lakeread02...
"Robert Morein" wrote in message
...
From http://www.scescape.net/~woods/elements/ruthenium.html
"The metal is one of the most effective hardeners for platinum and
palladium, and is alloyed with these metals to make electrical
contacts
for
severe wear resistance."
The extreme hardness of these contacts means that since perfect
flatness
cannot be achieved in relay contacts, such contact is limted to a
discrete
number of points.
Really? How hard is extreme hardness? Ever occur to you the harder
the
contact the smoother it can be polished? Which factor takes
precedence
in
determining contact resistance, smoothness or malleability?
Failure to answer the questions noted.
Yep, you failed again, sock puppet Morein.
How can you call him a sockpuppet?
Like this, he's a sock puppett.
You know his name, his phone number, his
address, and his academic history (such as it is).
It may in fact belong to a Robert Morein, but that doesn't mean he's the
guy posting here.
Besides, it's as valid as the statements he's been making about why he
doesn't have to offer proof on various subjects, like the ABX relays, or
his claimed ability to be immune from bias in sighted listening.
I know lots more about him than I know about you,
and I don't call you a sockpuppet, because you are not,
And he is either someone just pulling people's chains with his
anti-scinetific bull ****, or he's a sock puppet who actually believes
the crap he says.
Of course it is possible that there is a 3rd explanation, he is the
Robert Morein that went to the Supreme Court AND he's an idiot on
electronics as well.
None of the possiblities speak well for him.
Anybody posting here could be someone other than who they claim to be.
Your theory can be applied to you, as well as to anyone else.
As I said there are 3 possibilities.