" wrote in message
link.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
news

" wrote in message
link.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

" wrote in message
link.net...

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net
wrote in message ...


Robert Morein said:

ABX is fine for reseach on Hindi phonemes, codecs, and the like.
For hifi, we have something much better: our brains, and our hearts.

Talking like that to the Bug Eater is akin to lecturing snails on
formal
dining etiquette -- a complete waste of time.

Just because you come from a family of parasites......................

Mickey will only be content when a flock of eagles
...................


I'm content now, George.


I have a great hi-fi, and I know the best ways to improve it whenever
I choose.


Tell us all about your great hifi
What you got??

An amp, pream/tuner, CD player, cassette deck, DVD player,
non-audiophile approved turntable, electronic xover, 2 sattelite
speakers and a subwoofer, outboard Surround processor, and a comfy
chair.

Which particlar ones, dumbass.

Why are you responding to Morein?

You're the one telling us its 'great'

It is. If I told you all the brand names, no matter what they are, it
would open up a whole new set of attacks, so there's no point in naming
them. Some of it has already been mentioned, namely the amp, (Acoustat)
and the CD player (Rotel), so there's no way to hide them, and they are
both recognized as very good by any subjectivist rag you care to read.


I listened to a Rotel cd player a number of years back. Stereophile
reviewers loved it. I thought it was unlistenable.
I heard an Acoustat amp once, not under ideal conditions
in a store. It was ok, I have heard worse and I have heard better.