"Robert Morein" wrote in message
...

" wrote in message
link.net...

"Robert Morein" wrote in message
...

" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Robert Morein" wrote in message
...

" wrote in message
link.net...
Here you can find the article I was trying to find earlier.
I forgot I posted the whole thing a while back under the tread
title,
"A
bit
form the BBC."

You can find the entire article he

http://www.allaudios.org/detail-10016725.html

I haven't found a specific reference to ABX yet, ( I may have
misremember
that bit) but at least one to double blind testing.

You're imagining it, as inferior minds are prone to do.


Inferior minds, are the ones that think they have to point out how
much
smarter they think they are, when all the evidence points to them not
only
being less smart than they think, but being in complete denial of
reality.

Your denial of the efficacy and reliability of the ABX protocol, shows
you
are completely disconnected from reality.

You are dismissed.

Mikey, there's a spurious comma in the above sentence.
ABX has been proven worthless, by an argument I gave in another thread.

So the question remains, if ABX is worthless, why do so many people doing
audio research, rely on it?

Reason dictates that it is not worthless, but you are.

ABX is fine for reseach on Hindi phonemes, codecs, and the like.
For hifi, we have something much better: our brains, and our hearts.

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha