"Robert Morein" wrote in message
...

" wrote in message
link.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

" wrote in message
link.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

" wrote in message
link.net...
You can't debunk ABX, you can't discredit it, without discrediting
every branch of audio research, and you can't claim it masks
differences.

Why not relax and keep buying what you want, we won't stop you.
Just
keep quiet about the staggering differences between your new
Lirpa
fuel cel driven SET and how much bigger the sound stage is
compared
to your old Edsel cold fusion amp.

Because it may be the case.
And you don't know that iis is not.
I know there's no reason to suspect one amp may be that much
different
than another.
I know the burden of proof is on you if you believe it to be true,
it
is you who must present the evidence.

If you find some, I'll be happy to hear about it.


you don't have to accept any evidence, it is only an opinion.
Either way.
Once again you confirm your idiocy.

If there were amps that measured similarly enough, but sounded
different
it would for some sort of demonstrable reason, and there would be some
demonstrable evidence of it. There is none.

evidently, your measurements are not up to snuff.

Really? Your evidence of this is what?

Bad choice of relays, Mikey. Ruthenium has 27.6 times the resistance of
silver. Arny did a very bad thing.

Your argument has already been debunked.
IIRC that was not the final design.
None of which matter if it doesn't make an audible difference.

Thanks for showing you still have nothing.