" wrote in message
link.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

" wrote in message
link.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

" wrote in message
link.net...
You can't debunk ABX, you can't discredit it, without discrediting
every branch of audio research, and you can't claim it masks
differences.

Why not relax and keep buying what you want, we won't stop you.
Just keep quiet about the staggering differences between your new
Lirpa fuel cel driven SET and how much bigger the sound stage is
compared to your old Edsel cold fusion amp.

Because it may be the case.
And you don't know that iis is not.
I know there's no reason to suspect one amp may be that much different
than another.
I know the burden of proof is on you if you believe it to be true, it
is you who must present the evidence.

If you find some, I'll be happy to hear about it.


you don't have to accept any evidence, it is only an opinion.
Either way.
Once again you confirm your idiocy.

If there were amps that measured similarly enough, but sounded different
it would for some sort of demonstrable reason, and there would be some
demonstrable evidence of it. There is none.

evidently, your measurements are not up to snuff.

Really? Your evidence of this is what?

the same stuff you sent me yesterday.
If you standardized everything else in the setup, you could
use that as one better tool for measuring amps than the measurements
you currently use.