Thread: Summing up
View Single Post
  #12   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Robert Morein" wrote in message
...

" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Robert Morein" wrote in message
...

" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Robert Morein" wrote in message
...

" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Robert Morein" wrote in message
...

" wrote in message
nk.net...
From RAHE:

wrote in message
...
We see all manner of rhetorical and "what if" objections to
controlled
listening alone testing. What is the alternative?

We sum up by concluding that ABX is a paradigm that, while
theoretically
interesting, has not been implemented in a useful way in the real
world.

You sum up wrong as usual, it is the real world that acknowledges

ABX
as
a
relaible and valuable tool, which is why it is used by every
serious
organization doing audio research. Only audiuophiles who don't
like
the
truth reject it.

We
note that the believers in ABX seem to own substandard
amplifiers,
and
possess low quality ears and brains.


How would you know, you've never done a level matched, blind test
of
any
of
them.
Mikey, it's obvious.

Your judgement is not reliable. You thought I was Powell.
It's obvious that sighted listening is unreliable.
It's obvious you have no intention of ever putting your ears on the

line
to
show that you can hear the things you claim.

Mikey, other people have, as described by Ludovic.
He PROVES that the ABXers, including you, are liars.

He proves only that he doesn't understand or won't understand, that ABX

and
DBT comnparisons are relied on by the real audio professionals who are
making a difference.

"Professional", Mikey, means that only that one makes money at something.
It
says nothing about the ethics of a person.


Do you question the ethics of the BBC? Who are you to question anybody
about ethics, given your lack of same?

But you, Mikey, aren't smart
enough to be either a professional, an amateur, or even a perceptive
observer. You are a mere amphibian, the possessor of inferior mental
equipment, inferior ears, and an inferior amp.

Spoken like the coward and bad scientist you are.

Kudos to Ludovic for peeling away the fake veneer of the ABXers and
revealing the rot within.

Ludovic hasn't a ****ing clue about the validity of ABX, he just doesn't
like the facts that it reveals.