" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Robert Morein" wrote in message
...

" wrote in message
nk.net...
From RAHE:

wrote in message
...
We see all manner of rhetorical and "what if" objections to
controlled
listening alone testing. What is the alternative?

We sum up by concluding that ABX is a paradigm that, while theoretically
interesting, has not been implemented in a useful way in the real world.

You sum up wrong as usual, it is the real world that acknowledges ABX as a
relaible and valuable tool, which is why it is used by every serious
organization doing audio research. Only audiuophiles who don't like the
truth reject it.

We
note that the believers in ABX seem to own substandard amplifiers, and
possess low quality ears and brains.


How would you know, you've never done a level matched, blind test of any
of
them.
Mikey, it's obvious.