"George Middius" wrote in message
...



Where's Forrest Gump when we need him? ;-)

Nobody wants you to believe anything. All they want is for you to buy
their stuff.

Then why all the agitprop about better sound?

Who taught you that word, Mickey? Robert has been trying to school you in
avoiding these explosions of language abuse.

In your persistent delusional state, you believe that marketing is
theology. In
reality, it's entirely mundane. Grow up.


Marketing is about selling, reviewing is about showing the efficacy or lack
of for the device being reviewed. I don't expect reviewers to be part of
the marketing.

Apparently you believe nobody can enjoy their stereo unless they've been
brainwashed. Too bad your brain is too pickled to respond to ordinary
stimuli.

Wrong again, so far you're batting a thousand.

No, I'm quite right. Your patent inability to distinguish marketing from
proselytizing proves my point.


Marketing is what the advertisers pay for. Reviews are supposed to be
independent of that.

I think people should be informed, after that whatever decision they make
is
on them.

If they want to be informed, that's their choice. It's not up to marketers
to
inform buyers. Their role is to inflame buyers' interest in their
products.

Reviewers aren't supposed to be part of the marketing.

The problem is that they are being told by reviewers that stuff sounds
different when it can't actually be demonstrated that is so.

You're just plain dumb. No two ways about that.


Nasty comments from you are a badge of honor for me George, since you have
not a clue about audio technology, and have made your sole purpose on RAO
one of name calling an attacks against any sort of discussion of the
technical merits of audio gear.