"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Digital audio technology. You ought to try to learn how it works some
day!

I don't remember saying that I don't know the subject...

Assigning voltage to a time point?

Oh spare me the expert-sounding horsecrap!

That horsecrap is basic fundation of digital recording...

Yet another craphead who can't read. I specifically excluded that
possibility when I said:

"As long as there are slightly more than two sampling points, the
reconstruction of amplitude and phase is near-perfect."

Yes, slightly more than two. And higher it goes, less it becomes. I just
concluded, and brought new thought.
Nice, call your fellowgroupmembers crapheads. Agression comes from fear. Yo
do not have to be affraid, sometimes people makes mistakes, even you...

So higher the freqs on CD, sharper they become.

My boy you need to get your head out from that book where the sun shines
not, and spend some time in the real world.

Yeah yeah...

Thats why more
sample points are needed in high-end audio.

Nope, wrong.

And if you have good
speakers, you can really, maybe not actually hear the difference, but
feel the difference between
44.1kHz and 96kHz sampling rate.

Wrong. Look I told you were you could go and listen for yourself. Let me
guess, you're too cheap to buy a good 24/96 sound card. You spent all your
money on vinyl and toobs. Well, don't come belly-aching to me with your
erroneous crap.

Listen, not everybody can afford expensive digital stuff. However, I use
Echoaudio mia 24/96 which is more than a good soundcard.
And no, I dont use vinyl. Tube as a preamp yes.
So you only gave one page, maybe you just learned everything from there?
Let's not make stupid conclusions okay?

I would describe it as a more open,
brilliant, sparkling, fresh full airy sound. You can laugh but it's
true

It's false and its easy to demonstrate that its false. Just listen at the
place I told you to go listen to.

It is false that 96kHz is better sounding than 44.1kHz?!
Man, this is going to my archive to laugh occasionally...

True that we cannot "hear" above 22k or below 20Hz. But have you ever
"felt" 15Hz? Psicho acoustics are playing with that kind of problems.

I can hear a 15 KHz sine wave if its loud enough. Why would I need to
worry
about whether I can feel it or not?

No, actually you can't hear it. You can feel it. As you can feel supersonic
sounds. I don't have time to explain it to you now, read some books...

But again you can't read. What I said is

"Furthermore in CD audio, that happens at or above 22.05 KHz, which is way
more than people can hear the absence of in a musical/voice context.:

If you sit and think about it and have average or better intelligence, you
might eventually get what I was trying to say. If not, have an adult
explain
it to you!

Maybe you should think of you additude first, and then try to speak. Sound
better, like 96k...