I said



Calling you on your
dismissal of an entire line of products based on prejudice rather
than empirical experience was not a mistake.




Arny said




You call it prejudice, I call it analysis.


I said



Well, if there was any analysis going on you did it in private.


Arny said




Well, dooh. Where is it written that I have to post a detailed analysis of
my thought processes everytime I post an opinion?


Once you did it proved that I was right all along. Your dismissal was pure
prejudice. Of course most normal people would offer some explanation to begin
with.


I said



All you offered was conclusions about a product line you have never
heard.


Arny said




I you look at the thread, nobody who posts here has ever heard it, including
yourself sockpuppet wheel.


Yeah, no **** Sherlock. That's why nobody else commented on the product. If you
don't know what the **** you are talking about try shutting the **** up for a
change. You will end up with less egg on your face.


I said




Without any description of your analysis I have to call it
prejudice.


Arny said



It's like you to always presume the worst about everybody except the members
of your clique, who can do no wrong

No Arny. I had good reason. You made reference to a difference in beliefs you
have with the makers of those speakers. That was an obvious tip off that you
were slamming something based on your idiotic audio agenda rather than for any
good reasons. You were called on your bull****. That is the bottom line. So far
presuming the worst about you makes anyone look like a prophet. Unlike the
speakers you disparaged based on prejudice rather than experience you do have a
vivid track record.

I said



If you can cite any specific elements of the design you
think would cause the entire line to be dismissed based on experience
with other speakers that share those same alleged design flaws that
would constitute analysis and may show your position has merit.


Arny said




Still having problems with adding two and two I see.


Still trying to rationalize your ****ting on a company based on pure prejudice
I see.

Arny said



No self-respecting speaker designer or marketing person who follows the news
should be unaware of the unfavorable reception of the technical community to
Kimber's claims about his DiAural crossover design. Furthermore, anybody who
really understands how speakers work and reads Kimber's claims for "DiAural"
should know that they're the audio equivalent of an engine with 110%
efficiency.


No matter how you paint your venomous prejudice it still comes out as venomous
prejudice. Pathetic.


I said



it doesn't take a rocket science to see my general objection was to
your dismissal of a product line without any actual experience with
the product.


Arny said



Right, but in the face of it, what do we have to go on that's useful?


Nothing. That is why everyone else wisely chose not to open their mouths and
shove their feet in them. Obviously your ego and your hatred wouldn't allow you
to do the sensible thing. Nothing new there. It was those same character flaws
that got you sued by me.


I said




My mistaken presumption about the cause of your
prejudice against this product line does not change the broader
problem I see with your dismissal.


Arny said




Yes, you are a very self-righteous and hypocritical person sockpuppet Wheel.

Is this another example of your analysis skills? It follows the same pathology.
Form prejudicial opinions based on hatred and a lack of real knowledge and
experience.


Arny said




You have a long track record of setting up impossible hurdles for people you
don't like while tolerating and even congratulating highly egregious
behavior by yourself and people that you do like.


What a load of crap. i asked you to cite any proof of this bull**** in the last
post. obviously you found nothing. The standards such as don't comment on the
sound of something you haven't heard or, in this case, don't dismiss an entire
speaker line you haven't heard, are standards I set for myself and everyone
else. Try to find one example of your ridiculous claim about me setting hurdles
that are impossibly high. I realize you have lived the life of a chronic
underachiever who, admittedly, has never excelled at anything, but I fail to
see how even a mediocre person would find my standards of conduct so
unachievable. Maybe if you had a little self-control and were not so driven by
hatred and ego (ironic given your admissions of never excelling at anything)
you wouldn't find my standards so difficult at all.



Arny said




You know, I was over on the http://www.stereotimes.com/ web site thinking:
"I'll bet sockpuppet wheel eats this crap up for breakfast, lunch, and
dinner and thinks it's just great.


Obviously you are spending to much time fantasizing about me. Stop it. It's
creepy.


Arny said


As they say, living well is the best
revenge.


But for those who don't live well and don't excel at anything and are
overwhelmed by hatred and ego dismissing products out of pure prejudice,
accusing people of pedophilia and drug addiction and a long list of other
things you do on a regular basis are the only alternative. Please try living
well for a change. Here is a clue, 90,000+ posts on Usenent is sure sign of not
living well. I know you are not the sharpest knife in the drawer but even you
should be able to do the math.