On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:58:41 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:41:00 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 23:25:34 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Would it be a good thing if I were able to spend a week each
listening to and analyzing both systems before responding? In the
sense that my opinion would have basis rooted in detailed personal
experience, yes. However in the newsgroup context, the person
asking the question would have very likely moved on and never seen
my response two weeks after he asked his question. Also the chances
that any of us would have the opportunity to actually do a detailed
evaluation like this is basically zilch.

So, you think it's better to possibly influence someone based on
*no* empirical evidence about the actual sound of the product?

I view my advice as a "yes" for Atlantic Technology.

Then you should give it a yes without putting down a speaker that
you've never heard.

Big lie #2, I didn't put down any particular Aperion Audio speaker.

Yes you did.

Or maybe you think that Atlantic Technology is the only choice to
make.

Can't read can you Weil? I said I'd rather have Atlantic Technology than
Bose and Aperion.

No you didn't. You said *this:

"Given that Aperion Audio hypes proven snake oil - namely Kimber's
"DiAural" technology, they are easy to dismiss".

And that was just the opening salvo.

I guess in Weil World, there are just three speaker
manufacturers, Atlantic Technology, Bose and Aperion.

Therefore, you can tell us all about *your* Atlantic Technology
speakers. You know, the ones you've bought because they are better
than all others.

Inability to read and comprehend simple English noted.

Noted that you haven't put your money where your mouth is. In fact,
it's even questionable whether you've ever heard Atlantic Technology
speakers.

Boy, if this is 'science", frankly, I'm not sure I want any part of
it.

I'm sure you want no part of science whatsoever, Weil, You've as
much as said so here weekly for what 4 years?

I *am* a fan of the appropriate use of commas.

Too bad you aren't rigorous about English style in your own posts, Weil.

Whatever "English style" is supposed to be. You passing judgment about
English style is like a cottonmouth talking about rat preservation.

Another example of your hypocrisy.

And I'm a fan of science that's actually science, not your bizarro
snake oil version.

If irony killed...

You'd be long dead.