"ScottW" wrote in message
news:lDxwb.6312$ML6.5204@fed1read01
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message

On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 15:30:04 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"ScottW" wrote in message
news:Wb7wb.4949$ML6.3520@fed1read01
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"ScottW" wrote in message
news:VPVvb.4621$ML6.516@fed1read01
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"ScottW" wrote in message
news:AmUvb.4608$ML6.2599@fed1read01
"Erik Squires" wrote in
message
ervers.com...

So, here's my question. If I digitize a 15 kHz signal,
using a
44.1 kHz sampling rate, I'm going to get about 3 samples /
cycle.

Are the normal digital filters good enough to reproduce a 15
kHz signal with varying amplitude?

Deconstruct this signal to frequency domain and it won't be a
pure 15 kHz.

Wrong.

What is the frequency of the amplitude "variation"?

Obviously, 15 KHz.

Show me the Fourier series which contains only 15 kHz components
which results in a 15Khz waveform with "varying amplitude".


A 15 KHz wave itself has varying amplitude. The amplitude varies at
a rate of 15 KHz.

You talk instantaneous values, him talk envelope. Waste time.

That's his choice. If he wants a specific answer he should ask a
specific question.

Look at the original post.

I did.

Your context is wrong.

Wrong, the context wasn't set by me/ The problemis your comment is vague.

Too bad you gave the original poster such erroneous input.

Too bad you can't take responsibility for your own actions.