View Single Post
  #9   Report Post  
Powell
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hear the quacking > 20 KHz (Again)


"Arny Krueger" wrote

So, you can flip pennies or compare 24/44 to
24/96 and get pretty much the same results,
provided you hold all other relevant variables
equal.


"relevant variables"... you have not demonstrated that.


Powell, since you seem to be very weak on the concept,
let me advise you that this is one of the things that happens
when you read the paper that was cited. Copyright laws
and newsgroup rules prohibit posting the whole thing.

More excuses or should I say... quack, quack, quack.


Without knowing the exact methodology, subject
screening and training, equipment used, et cetera...
the results are interesting but not conclusive or even
necessarily scientific.


That's why I gave a proper cite of the paper I quoted,
including how to quickly get your very own copy for a
nominal fee.

You brought this subject to the floor... "stand and
deliver."


Given it's a Audio Engineering
Society paper I suspect this study had a near zero
budget and no leadership prominence.


Big talk from a guy who just learned how to hook
up XLR mic cables last week, and is still struggling
with trying to use a consumer sound card for
audio production purposes.

This is just another diversion tactic away from
the topic. You can run away now.