"dave weil" wrote in message

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:57:40 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

That's not what I claimed about Scotty in this case, Weil. Thanks for
showing your true deceptive colors so quickly.

You know, I almost wrote that you would do this exact thing.

Sure Weil, and that's because you knew you were lying. You know that I tend
to catch you lying and complain about it. Obviously you know that you are
lying, or it wouldn't be a lie. That makes it easy for you to predict that I
will catch you lying and then I will complain about your lie(s).

Because I
didn't go back and get an *exact* quote, you can claimed you didn't
use the word "diss" or something like it.

You're lying again, Weil. You've shifted focus from an entire sentence to
just one word: "diss". Predictably, you deleted what you had just claimed.
Now you're trying to change the focus from what you just said in your
previous post, to this one trivial word.

But I decided not to simply to watch you do this.

No Weil, you decided to do some more deceptive editing, and then you told
another lie.

That's also why I didn't bother to go back and
cut and paste your exact quote. I wanted to see you pull this common
tactic of yours.

Given Weil that it's predictable that you'll lie and delete relevant text
and lie again, my tactics are indeed quite predictable. I take exception to
your lying and point out your simple-minded and utterly transparent
strategy.

Well guys, this is *exactly* the sort of thing that Arnold foists on
the group.

What to do when there are so many simpletons telling so many transparent
lies?

He claims that he *had* the proof in a window and was ready to send
it, but ScottW didn't reply in a timely fashion. So suddenly, he's off
the hook to supply the proof.

Oh come on Weil. My strategy is a lot more complex than that. I hold the
issue out as bait and put pressure on you guys until you tell lots and lots
of transparent lies. If any of you gets desperate enough to actually argue
based on the original facts, the whole situation blows up in your faces,
because I've got my facts straight. You just have to reward me by letting me
catch you lying enough, and then if I'm in the mood, I deliver what I had in
my pocket all along.

Well, the point is, Arnold doesn't have the proof because IT DOESN'T
EXIST.

By this time Weil you've told enough lies that I suspect that you've even
found the proof I've had in my pocket all along. Look at all the lies you've
told just this morning!

I wish you would take the RAHE solution. Now.

What would the "RAHE solution" be?