Greg Singh wrote:

Bruce J. Richman wrote:

Your credibility is zero, Greg.


No, that's not true either. I suppose in your alternate universe there
exists a Brubeck LP called "Take Five", right? The only reason to harp
on this is that the whole reason for calling the album "Time Out" is to
call attention to the groups penchant for weird time signatures, so to
not know the actually title eats at your credility on a couple of
different levels.



Yourr analysis is wrong. Of course, the fact that you have promoted numerous
li9es about6 me over the years completely destroys your ability to judge my
credibility in an objective fashion. And I'm well aware of teh various
different time signatures used in the selections on the Time Out album, whether
we'are talking about Take Five, or any of the other selection on the album.
The fact that I made a slip of the tongue has nothing to do with my credibility
whatsoever. And only a petty flamer such as yourself would even notice it -
but then again, your sole purpose for being on RAO, as most of us know, is to
try and fight with others. (Many of commented on this before).



And your dishonesty has been demonstrated over
and over again concerning both audio issues and other topics as well. Your
arrogance and silly bragging about your imaginary skills are well known to
practically all RAO regulars.


My speakers are really good, Bruce. That's a fact.

There is no reason that anybody should believe you, since to promote your
products, you resort to the old, tired salesman's ploy of bashing other
products such as Quads, Martin Logans, Dunlavys and probably many others as
well.

If you care to
refute that fact, I would suggest you bid on one of my auctions where it
is a lot harder for me to refuse to sell you a pair.






There is no fact that you given to refute, other than your biased opinion -
which is not a fact. You've made no effort whatsoever to provide any evidence
- other than your questionable words - that your speakers are superior to any
others. And when a relatively objective reviewer found even the smallest flaws
(in his iopinion) with your speakers, you immediately resorted to personal
attacks upon him. So why should anybody bother to try and review your
speakers, since you have no tolerance for either suggestions or constructive
criticism?




Bruce J. Richman