"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 12:00:57 -0800, "Michael Mckelvy"
wrote:


"dave weil" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:18:12 -0800, "Michael Mckelvy"
wrote:


"dave weil" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 10:00:10 -0800, "Michael Mckelvy"
wrote:

What is *this* supposed to mean?

It means I didn't find an op-ed and say, "I'll bet this will ****
off
Dave
Weil. It was something might cause many people to think.

Then why was it so important that I didn't comment on it?

Where did I say it was?

When you noted that I hadn't commented on it. Why did you bother to
challenge me on it in the first place if it wasn't important?

I didn't.

Sure you did.

Let me remind you:

"It was no secret that it came from the LA Daily News, those who have
reading difficulty like Weil could have easily found if they wanted
to. I do notice he had no comment at all on the substance of the
piece".

Spin *that* one.

You've already done a god job. That wasn't a challenge it was simply a
comment on the fact that you always complain when I post things from other
sources.

Would you like another chair for your ego?