"Fella" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:



How can you say such a thing?

Do you know my viewpoint better than I?

You didn't say that all amps, cd paleyers, etc, sound the
same
there, did you? You didn't say wire is wire. That's your
viewpoint.

Nobody asked.
/
Fella, you're way off topic here.

It's exactly the topic, you are all about argument and
whining
on the usenet, behind a keyboard, nothing else.

Except that isn't true. That's bout you, but not about me.
You and Middius are faceless, soundless dweebs, while pix of
me are posted all over the web, as is a lenthy recording of
me talking about my ideas about audio.

But when you
meet someone in the flesh you water it down to the point
where
you lose some of the edge (and I *am* talking about your
judgements and views on audio) to make yourslef more
acceptable.

We weren't talking about
your hatred for me, but rather what my viewpoint is.

Those are observations Arny,

They are your observations, but you weren't there were you?

I don't hate you, not anymore.

Thank you.

You mean that the way the anecdote went down Atkinson was
as
weak on scientific investigation then as he is now?

Science itself is weak when it somes to investigating such
phenomenon, yet.

It's a lot stronger than the science that yu and Atkinson
are willing or capable of doing.

Science is about *explaining* real world
occurences, real world phenomenon.


I said that at the debate.


Science is *NOT* about finding a means to force the real
world
to comply with a given set of thought.

Right. Science is not about proving the fallacious theories
of mislead audiophiles.

You practice skcienccence, Arny, not science.

Prove it. That's just Middius-gibberish.

what was wrong with the Quad
after he determined that there was a problem.


I donät think there was anyting wrong wth the quad.

Oh you think that Atkinson was hearing problems that didn't
exist?

Both of you got excited, couldn't manage to even breathe
properly. It was simple situational fear, I guess.

Well Fella, its easy to be perfect in your mind.

I am not saying that I am the perfect public speaker. I
am
just saying that you two were not.

That's a trivial observation if there ever was one.

Arguably the biggest accomplishment in my life
is one going on two children with PhDs in Cancer Biology.

That's *their* accomplishment, not yours,

Speaks to your disconnnectedness with child-rearing.

and I congratulate them for it, not you.

They do deserve a lot of credit.

Let's say that one of them makes a
breakthrough accomplishment and gets awarded the nobel
prize.

Unlikely, but a nice thought.

Why not? I wish them all the luck, and best. In any case,
it
would not be *you* that would get that award, it would be
given to *them*.

So, do you think that they will forget their parent's
assistance and guidance?

Just be happt that you didn't get in their way.

Speaks to your disconnnectedness with child-rearing.

that whatever
reason to spill poison you have, you spilt it on the
usenet,
and not on them.

I only tried to provide an antidote for the rats that were
already poisoned.