"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
...

"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
...


Think how much better we could do without the EPA sucking up money that
could go to local law enforcement.
No transfer cost, no salaries to paper shuffling federal drones, local
contol over local problems, no waiting for the feds to act. It makes
better
sense.

Then there's the fact that there won't always be sensible people in
charge.
Better there should be no EPA, no DOE, no HUD, none of these agencies do
anything but spend money that could be more efficently spent at local
levels.

They are necessary,

OSAF. We got along for many years without them.

but, it is also necessary to spend money at the local
level, under
local control. Remeber Nixon's "revenue sahring"? I thought that was one
of
his best ideas.
You still have Federal Agencies, coordinating Federal programs, but you
also
pass Federal
money directly to states, counties and municipalities, for them to spend
on
programs
that they decide upon.

Much simpler to just leave it where it came from in the first place. No
handling charge that way.


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000
Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption
=---