"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
...


Think how much better we could do without the EPA sucking up money that
could go to local law enforcement.
No transfer cost, no salaries to paper shuffling federal drones, local
contol over local problems, no waiting for the feds to act. It makes
better
sense.

Then there's the fact that there won't always be sensible people in
charge.
Better there should be no EPA, no DOE, no HUD, none of these agencies do
anything but spend money that could be more efficently spent at local
levels.

They are necessary, but, it is also necessary to spend money at the local
level, under
local control. Remeber Nixon's "revenue sahring"? I thought that was one of
his best ideas.
You still have Federal Agencies, coordinating Federal programs, but you also
pass Federal
money directly to states, counties and municipalities, for them to spend on
programs
that they decide upon.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---