"MINe 109" wrote in message
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:
"MINe 109" wrote in message
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:
"MINe 109" wrote in message
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Lionel" wrote in message
George M. Middius a écrit :
Else you'd be unable
to live with yourself.
Experience is speaking.
Here's a couple of speculative thoughts.
(1) One of the areas where "The Tape" file that John
Atkinson sent me is incomplete, is that half of the
conversation, presumably by the caller who is known
here
as "The Devil", is missing.
Obviously, the caller, who known around here as "The
Devil"
feared that he would be identified based on the sound
of
his voice. Whose voice would be instantly
recognizable to
RAO
readers, particularly at this time, particularly
since
the
posting of the HE2005 debate?
The point was that it was you on "The Tape." IIRC,
that
excerpt was posted months if not years before the
debate.
You must be privy to something I don't know, Stephen.
You
also seem to think you know quite a bit about a file
that
Atkinson sent me by private email. Why is that?
You'll find this was discussed right here on RAO.
Could you be less specific and informative, Stephen?
Yes.
I''l bet. And to drive your point home Stephen, you make a
valiant effort at the same. Trouble is, your evasions tell a
sad story about your character, or lack thereof.
Another point is that it's the same recording that was
distributed to many RAO regulars years ago.
Same question. You seem to be claiming perfect knowlege
about my private email, Stephen. How do you know that the
two files are in fact identical?
I assume they are not identical: one is abridged and
removes
or obscures the Devil's side of the conversation.
Chance of story noted.
The only reason I
haven't deleted my copy is that it's on my old computer
which
hasn't been powered up since 2003 or so.
Irrelevant.
It's old, old news.
Doooh!
(2) Atkinson has long been adamant that none of his
staff
ever posts on RAO. I've always contended that if
people post
on RAO under aliases that Atkinson doesn't know, he
can't
properly make this claim.
One way that Atkinson could know for sure that his
staff
never posts on RAO is if he knows the true identity
of
*every* person who posts on RAO, including say "The
Devil".
One way Atkinson could know the true identity of "The
Devil"
would be if "The Devil" was indeed Atkinson himself.
Nope. To apply your logic, wouldn't his voice be
"instantly
recognizable" to you? You've heard them both.
Not in any reasonably close proximity.
All Brits sound the same to you?
Irrelevant, and insulting.
It saves time to manufacture offenses, doesn't it?
I'll leave that to you, Stephen. You obviously tried to
manufacture this offense.
JA has a slight speech
impediment, according to him in posts on RAO. Proximity
would
not be required.
I know no such thing.
Why don't know what he sounds like given that there is a
lengthy voice recording of it on the web?
Maybe you can't identify voices on the phone.
Maybe I can't identify voices that are obliterated. Indeed,
its quite certain that I can't identify voices that are
obliterated.
Your next bit is
garbled, but I don't need to know what JA sounds like to
know
he's not on "The Tape."
That's an interesting clam Stephen. I'll bet that you can't
clarify it very much.
Here's a speculative thought: "The Devil" was right to
obscure
his part of the conversation considering your
unfounded
speculation at this time.
Which unfounded speculation might that be?
Your previous post.
Except this is just baseless name-calling on your part,
Stephen.
Except that it's not baseless and it's not name-calling.
Prove it.
Stephen, do you deny that "The Devil" and Middius
posted
quite a large number of necrophilia/pedophilia/incest
fantasies on RAO?
It's all in Google.
It's pretty damning, isn't it?
You're in Google, too.
So what? I'm in google as objecting to the Devil's lies and
slanders, as well as those of Middius. One thing that is
quite clear Stephen is how evasive you become when it comes
to commenting on their evil deeds. Why is that?
|