In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"MINe 109" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Lionel" wrote in message

George M. Middius a écrit :

Else you'd be unable
to live with yourself.

Experience is speaking.

Here's a couple of speculative thoughts.

(1) One of the areas where "The Tape" file that John
Atkinson sent me is incomplete, is that half of the
conversation, presumably by the caller who is known here
as
"The Devil", is missing.

Obviously, the caller, who known around here as "The
Devil"
feared that he would be identified based on the sound of
his
voice. Whose voice would be instantly recognizable to RAO
readers, particularly at this time, particularly since
the
posting of the HE2005 debate?

The point was that it was you on "The Tape." IIRC, that
excerpt was posted months if not years before the debate.

You must be privy to something I don't know, Stephen. You
also seem to think you know quite a bit about a file that
Atkinson sent me by private email. Why is that?

You'll find this was discussed right here on RAO.

Another point is that it's the same recording that was distributed to
many RAO regulars years ago. The only reason I haven't deleted my copy
is that it's on my old computer which hasn't been powered up since 2003
or so.

(2) Atkinson has long been adamant that none of his
staff
ever posts on RAO. I've always contended that if people
post
on RAO under aliases that Atkinson doesn't know, he can't
properly make this claim.

One way that Atkinson could know for sure that his staff
never posts on RAO is if he knows the true identity of
*every* person who posts on RAO, including say "The
Devil".
One way Atkinson could know the true identity of "The
Devil"
would be if "The Devil" was indeed Atkinson himself.

Nope. To apply your logic, wouldn't his voice be
"instantly
recognizable" to you? You've heard them both.

Not in any reasonably close proximity.

All Brits sound the same to you? JA has a slight speech impediment,
according to him in posts on RAO. Proximity would not be required.

Here's a speculative thought: "The Devil" was right to
obscure
his part of the conversation considering your unfounded
speculation at this time.

Which unfounded speculation might that be?

Your previous post.

Stephen, do you deny that "The Devil" and Middius posted
quite a large number of necrophilia/pedophilia/incest
fantasies on RAO?

It's all in Google.

Stephen