"S888Wheel" wrote in message

Arny said


Not at all. Plenty of evidence already exists that RAO is a place
where people take advantage of the fact that everything is
pre-labeled "opinion" and therefore nobody with a brain takes it
seriously. Therefore, no harm can be done to anybody's or anything's
reputation. That was the original plan.

Sorry to see you still haven't figured out the difference between an
opinion and a libelous false accustaion as the law sees it.

Cite a legal opinion that contradicts what I just said or admit that you're
making it up as you go along. This legal opinion must apply specifically to
the Usenet newsgroup rec.audio.opinion.


Arny said


Of course I did suggest that it takes a minimal brain to perceive RAO
properly. Sorry to leave you out, sockpuppet wheel.

You have suggested a lot of crazy things Arny.

Arny said


Finally, Mr. Middius was kind enough to print the California law
about libel and you were as I recall kind enough to confirm the
accuracy of his post.

Yes he did and I did.


Arny said

California law doesn't say that there are certain magic words or
specific means of expression that makes an utterance into libel, now
does it?

Yes it does. He posted the code on libel and I confirmed it. He did
not post code which follows it called Libel per se. You might want to
check it out. Have you found the link to the California Codes or do i
need to post that code for you as well?

I didn't look.

Arny said

That
means that the various carefully-worded insults that you've
addressed to me are no more or less libel than anything I've
addressed to you.

Nope.

Prove it.

Arny said


So if I've got this right your father is a lawyer. Is he supporting
you in this case to win, or to teach you a lesson? Or is he
supporting you at all?

Naturally, you haven't got it right. And, naturally, your questions
are premised on your misunderstanding and/or ignorance of the
relevant facts including the full content of the California Codes
regarding libel.

Prove it.