Arny said


Not at all. Plenty of evidence already exists that RAO is a place where
people take advantage of the fact that everything is pre-labeled "opinion"
and therefore nobody with a brain takes it seriously. Therefore, no harm can
be done to anybody's or anything's reputation. That was the original plan.

Sorry to see you still haven't figured out the difference between an opinion
and a libelous false accustaion as the law sees it.

Arny said


Of course I did suggest that it takes a minimal brain to perceive RAO
properly. Sorry to leave you out, sockpuppet wheel.

You have suggested a lot of crazy things Arny.

Arny said


Finally, Mr. Middius was kind enough to print the California law about libel
and you were as I recall kind enough to confirm the accuracy of his post.

Yes he did and I did.


Arny said

California law doesn't say that there are certain magic words or specific
means of expression that makes an utterance into libel, now does it?

Yes it does. He posted the code on libel and I confirmed it. He did not post
code which follows it called Libel per se. You might want to check it out. Have
you found the link to the California Codes or do i need to post that code for
you as well?

Arny said

That
means that the various carefully-worded insults that you've addressed to me
are no more or less libel than anything I've addressed to you.

Nope.

Arny said


So if I've got this right your father is a lawyer. Is he supporting you in
this case to win, or to teach you a lesson? Or is he supporting you at all?


Naturally, you haven't got it right. And, naturally, your questions are
premised on your misunderstanding and/or ignorance of the relevant facts
including the full content of the California Codes regarding libel.