Arny Krueger wrote:
ScottW wrote:
Arny Krueger wrote:
ScottW wrote:
Arny Krueger wrote:
ScottW wrote:

(1) What kind of product tests are demonstrated at the
PCABX
web site, IOW which kinds of products are demonstrated?

amps, soundcards, coders&decoders & minidisc

OK, so you can read after all, Scott.

(2) Are there any tests of DVD players at the PCABX web
site? If not, where do you get off mentioning them in
relation to it?

Sorry... thanks for pointing out the PCABX is useless
for the vast
majority of audio equipment sources in use today.

In your delusional fantasies, Scoot.

Then why haven't you provided any in your tests?

Laziness.

Further PCABX training is flawed due to uncontrolled
reproduction
variables.

Name those variables and state how they are totally
uncontrolled.

Why don't you tell me how you are controlling the noise
level of my
PC at work. It sucks BTW.

Irrelevant.

I named the variable and this is the best you can do?

Scottie, you seem to know that your PC at work is noisy. Why
don't you control it?

It's not really my PC, you probably don't understand how a big
company supports it IT infrastructure but suffice it to say allowing
individuals to customize their desktops is not an option.

Why do you need my help to do the
right thing?

Perhaps if you specified approve PCs for playing back the
files or insisted people
copied the files to CD for playback on approved audio
systems but you
don't do that.

I do it implicitly. I provide
http://www.pcabx.com/training/index.htm which says:

"If you have difficulty completing any samples rated
"Difficult" or easier, please consider upgrading your
playback system including loudspeakers, sound card,
amplifier and listening environment.

Are you now claiming that listener training is a substitute for system
certification?

Please see the sidebar
titled 'What Makes A Good Sound System For PCABX?'."

I saw that and it is totally inadequate. You think power supply noise
levels have no impact on sound cards for just one example?


You think people can evaluate audible amplifier
differences with a
ghetto blaster?

Pardon me for thinking that people can read.


As comparison... when you made ABX boxes... didn't you
try to make
sure they didn't have an audible influsion on the signal
they switched?

If you mean did we fix our client's equipment like you
want
me to fix yours, the answer is no.

You are stupid.

Really Scotty? I've just proven that you can read. Why
should I take advice from an illiterate like you?

I rest my case.


In those cases the clients equipment was under
evaluation... in this case the equipment in question is
test
equipment... nothing at all to do with the equipment under
evaluation.

I test the suitability of people's systems implicitly. I
provide http://www.pcabx.com/training/index.htm .

You don't test... they have a tool you provide to test. A tool that
is certified by subjective human perception. What a joke.

ScottW