ScottW wrote:
Arny Krueger wrote:
ScottW wrote:
Arny Krueger wrote:
ScottW wrote:

(1) What kind of product tests are demonstrated at the
PCABX
web site, IOW which kinds of products are demonstrated?

amps, soundcards, coders&decoders & minidisc

OK, so you can read after all, Scott.

(2) Are there any tests of DVD players at the PCABX web
site? If not, where do you get off mentioning them in
relation to it?

Sorry... thanks for pointing out the PCABX is useless
for the vast
majority of audio equipment sources in use today.

In your delusional fantasies, Scoot.

Then why haven't you provided any in your tests?

Laziness.

Further PCABX training is flawed due to uncontrolled
reproduction
variables.

Name those variables and state how they are totally
uncontrolled.

Why don't you tell me how you are controlling the noise
level of my
PC at work. It sucks BTW.

Irrelevant.

I named the variable and this is the best you can do?

Scottie, you seem to know that your PC at work is noisy. Why
don't you control it? Why do you need my help to do the
right thing?

Perhaps if you specified approve PCs for playing back the
files or insisted people
copied the files to CD for playback on approved audio
systems but you
don't do that.

I do it implicitly. I provide
http://www.pcabx.com/training/index.htm which says:

"If you have difficulty completing any samples rated
"Difficult" or easier, please consider upgrading your
playback system including loudspeakers, sound card,
amplifier and listening environment. Please see the sidebar
titled 'What Makes A Good Sound System For PCABX?'."

You think people can evaluate audible amplifier
differences with a
ghetto blaster?

Pardon me for thinking that people can read.


As comparison... when you made ABX boxes... didn't you
try to make
sure they didn't have an audible influsion on the signal
they switched?

If you mean did we fix our client's equipment like you
want
me to fix yours, the answer is no.

You are stupid.

Really Scotty? I've just proven that you can read. Why
should I take advice from an illiterate like you?

In those cases the clients equipment was under
evaluation... in this case the equipment in question is
test
equipment... nothing at all to do with the equipment under
evaluation.

I test the suitability of people's systems implicitly. I
provide http://www.pcabx.com/training/index.htm .